This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc 3.3.3-1, gcc-mingw-20030911-2 missing java headers
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-rcm at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 22:28:16 -0400
- Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: gcc 3.3.3-1, gcc-mingw-20030911-2 missing java headers
- References: <20030921000411.86E4632A822@redhat.com> <3F7E2B7A.email@example.com>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 07:07:54PM -0700, Jim Kleckner wrote:
>Is it possible the java code simply wasn't configured to build?
>All of the java headers are missing.
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I've moved all of the latest gcc stuff out of "test" and into "current".
>>This is the standard gcc 3.3.1 release from gcc.gnu.org + patches from
>>Danny Smith and (to a vastly lesser extent) me. If you are interested
>>in checking these sources out of gcc's cvs repository, the branch tag is
>>cygming331. But, please, no questions about where to go or how to do
>>that on the cygwin list. Go to gcc.gnu.org for that kind of info.
>>There were vague reports of gcj being broken during the gcc test period
>>but I never saw a true bug report for this. Since I'm not a java user,
>>I can only provide this as-is.
>Here are the things I looked at:
So, you checked everything but the release announcement which said:
"There were vague reports of gcj being broken during the gcc test period
but I never saw a true bug report for this. Since I'm not a java user,
I can only provide this as-is."
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html