This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: latest cygcheck -c is expensive


On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 12:28:05AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 08:42:49PM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
>>On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:01:27PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> If the only concern is that cygcheck takes a long time, now, then,
>>> like I said, that is something that can be rectified.
>>
>>Yes, the above is my real concern.
>
>I just hacked cygcheck to avoid calling gzip and use a mingw libz.a
>(courtesy of Chuck Wilson) and it takes 26 seconds to complete on my
>dual PIII 733MHZ WinXP system.  I have most packages installed.
>
>Is that still too slow?

I should add that the previous version took 1 minute, 9 seconds.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]