This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Binaries compiled with GCC 3.2-3 much bigger than with 2.95.3-10?
- From: Lapo Luchini <lapo at lapo dot it>
- To: "Frédéric L. W. Meunier"<0 at pervalidus dot tk>
- Cc: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 10:14:25 +0200
- Subject: Re: Binaries compiled with GCC 3.2-3 much bigger than with 2.95.3-10?
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.56.0309050029490.149@pervalidus.dyndns.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Frédéric L. W. Meunier wrote:
| I just switched to 3.2-3 and was impressed with the following:
|
| Cygwin -O2 -O2 + -Wl,-s -Os -Os + -Wl,-s What's so
| different in 3.2-3 ? On Linux GCC 3.x produced smaller binaries. On
| Cygwin the size doubled.
Did you "strip" the executable produced?
AFAIK gcc3 has much more "debug" infos, but once stripped should be of a
similiar size.
- --
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo@lapo.it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAj9YRd8ACgkQaJiCLMjyUvt4+gCaAtOxJWOh53VQGlrqHR5C5Q50
GwUAnjf1hIJbE94w7QUyg9JVCNrE29Eg
=jR8F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/