This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:44:08PM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>As described, the memory leak is obviously not in cygwin. It is in
>>windows. I was adding some clarification to the issue by changing a
>>"may be" to a "definitely is".
>>I think that this kind of clarification is more useful than your
>>message, which essentially says "If we could figure out what was causing
>>the problem then maybe it could be fixed". Personally, I don't see how
>>that observation is useful.
>>Having had some experience with this, I find it highly doubtful that any
>>useful data will come from people posting their "me too" experiences.
>>If someone wants to fix this then researching the Microsoft Knowledge
>>Base might be a place to start. A google search might also be helpful.
>Could it be *possible* that cygwin leaves some memory allocated? Does
>windows claim to free all memory allocated by a process when it exits?
Even Windows 95 should be enough of an operating system that it should
free memory on exit. If that was not the case, I could easily write a
program that would bring the system to its knees. Of course that is
easy to do with Windows 9x in any event but I haven't heard about this
particular problem there.
>What about cygwin shared memory?
I suppose it is possible that cygwin could be allocating shared memory.
That would disappear when the last process which had a pointer to it
went away. I haven't heard that it has been the case that memory
reappears when all cygwin processes disappear.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html