This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Controversial what if.... we disable ntsec by default again?
Doug VanLeuven wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 06:46:05AM -0700, Doug VanLeuven wrote:
Why isn't ntsec a mount option?
The standard reason.
Which is the standard reason?
1. It's that way because nobody has coded it yet.
2. It's that way because the core team analyzed it and believe it is
best done the way it is.
The standard reason is "because we're mean".
To answer your question about which of the two options above explain
why 'ntsec' is not a mount option, the answer is both. Of course, if
someone contributes (1) and it's convincing, then that just means that
(2) now applies to this new implementation. :-)
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html