This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: redistribution cygwin1.dll
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:07:45PM -0400, Jim Drash wrote:
>No I am not thinking trademark. Copyright law is based upon contract law.
>So there is legal "detriment" on both sides. Failure to enforce
>provisions of a contact can make that contract voidible <sp?>.
>I am very tied of this debate. The simple thing is to follow the details
>of the GPL (or whatever licenses applies) regardless of how "silly"
>anyone thinks it is.
>It is just so trivial for developers to comply and debates as to why one
>should not have to comply merely waste everyone's time and seem to make
>cgf more mean <rofl>
That's for sure. And the obvious interpretation is that if I'm becoming
more mean, I must really be enjoying this, right?
Anyway, thank you for your interpretation. Of course, you're not a
lawyer (I assume) so now we can play that game if we wanted to prolong
this. I hope we can all avoid that.
If we can all move off this issue and stop responding to the trolls I
would really appreciate it.
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to firstname.lastname@example.org
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html