This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: cygwin.bat

cgf wrote in <>
in gmane.os.cygwin on Sat, 10 May 2003 22:18:35 -0400:

> >> >If you use cygwin.bat, then under Windows NT/2k/XP you first have a
> >> >CMD.EXE process created and then a bash.exe. The CMD.EXE sits around
> >> >doing nothing until the bash.exe process exits.
> >> > [snip]

> >Negligible on a modern PC. Noticeable on some of the kit I've got
> >here. ;-)

> I *really* find that hard to believe.  I've run cygwin on some pretty
> slow computers and I've never noticed a slowdown from running bash
> in a command shell.  Even Windows should be smart enough to know that
> it can swap out most of when bash.exe is running so I
> don't know how this could be a resource thing.

Oh yes. I've already said that the general system slow down due to one
extra waiting process isn't going to be noticeable. (Although just
because a process is swapped out doesn't mean it ceases consuming
resources, especially on Windows!)

But the overhead in /launching/ an extra CMD.EXE to process the ".BAT"
file that then starts up bash.exe can be noticed on old kit under NT.

I suspect that on Win9x the difference is much smaller because,
whether I start bash.exe directly or via cygwin.bat, a WINOA386.MOD
process is always created as well as a BASH.EXE.

Sam Edge

Unsubscribe info:
Problem reports:

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]