This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: cygipc (and PostgreSQL) XP problem resolved!
Robert Collins wrote:
key_t, as it's used for ipc, is likely to be *problematic* to transition
in a 'fat binary' style.
You'd need a 32 bit set of key creation routines, and and translation
table to lookup 32bit keys in the list of 64 bit keys ....
Which basically aliases the entire 64bit key space down to 32bit space
-- which kinda short circuits whole reason that cygdaemon wanted 64bits
in the first place.
I don't think it's worthwhile to do a 'fat binary' style implementation
Given that cygipc is *not* in cygwin today, and you'd be adding it, I'd
simply have it 64 bit from the first release uploaded to sources.
Yes, I agree -- but (obviously) only if newlib/cygwin decide that the
64bit key_t definition is a good idea, and accept a patch to do so.
And I'd time that for oh, a day after cygwin 1.5 goes up as a testing
package. (And release cygipc as testing whilst cygwin 1.5 stays in
Yeah, that sounds reasonable.
I take it you're in favor of adding cygipc to the distro (or are you
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html