This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [Problem] mempcpy is missing? (FAQ alert)
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:50:02PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Breaking up the headers or adding a OS-specific "capability.h", or
>>something similar, which defines __HAVE_CLOCK would probably be the
>>best way to deal with this. Assuming that this was a major issue --
>>which I don't think it is.
>You mean, if it ain't broke don't mess with it?
>Where have I heard that before...
I think I just made it up.
I'm so proud.
Who would have thought, two major new concepts in two weeks? First
it was the "simple test case" and now this. I'm really on a roll.
Heh. Get it "on a roll"? That's a new phrase that I just thought of.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html