This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Why the rash of people bypassing setup.exe to install?
andrew clarke wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 07:50:48AM +1100, andrew clarke wrote:
>> Section 2 of the FAQ might also put people off using Setup because
>> it's described as a "work-in-progress" and seemingly a bit of a
>> moving target.
> Actually, just out of interest, will new Setup programs always be
> backward-compatible (within reason) with packages designed for old
> versions of Setup? The point being, a user should expect to be
> able to install an old .tar.bz2 file from a local directory using
> the latest version of Setup. If not, it should be recommended that
> users keep their old version of setup.exe (and not just overwrite
> it with the newest setup.exe) because the new version may not be able
> to install packages designed for the old version, because it's a
The package format has never broken compatibility yet, and I don't think it
> --08:06:16-- http://cygwin.com/setup.exe
> 4 Last-Modified: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 00:50:47 GMT
> Hmm, nobody is working on it after all?
Oh, lots of work has been going on, but all in CVS.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html