This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
poor performance -- is Cygwin to blame?..
- From: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx at aldan dot algebra dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:52:49 -0500
- Subject: poor performance -- is Cygwin to blame?..
- Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc.
I have a PVM based distributed application. One of the set of computing
tasks is initially distributed to each participating machine.
After that, each machine gets a new task when it returns the results for
the previous one. The Linux box outperforms the Windows XP on the same
hardware -- Dell Dimension 4500 Pentium4 @2.26 GHz -- at the ratio of
325:200... An earlier Dell Dimension 4400 with Pentium 4 @2GHz running
FreeBSD is proportionally slower than the Linux box, but still beats the
Win boxen by far..
Another (older) FreeBSD box running on PentiumII @450MHz is on par with
Win2K on Pentium3 @1GHz.
The computations are NOT memory intensive, but involve a lot of
``double'' number crunching (with log(3), pow(3), exp(3), et al).
The PVM and the computing program are compiled under CygWin on Windows.
The same optimizations flags (-O -march=pentium3 -fomit-frame-pointer)
are used with the same GCC 3.2.x compiler. (On the older FreeBSD, the
march is pentiumpro and the GCC is 2.95.2).
I know about Windows' bloat, etc., but am surprised to see it make SO
much of a difference. May be, using Cygwin gives too much overhead, and
I should continue on the painful path to using the "native" Windows PVM?
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html