This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: cygwin License related Query....

> >Well, perhaps, but I think those two paragraphs are the clearest and
> >most concise "layman's terms" explanation of Cygwin licensing I've read
> >to date.  All it needs is a "No, a link to the Cygwin site won't cut it"
> >paragraph and I'd say it would make a good FAQ.
> My response was tailored to the requirements that were presented.  It is
> not that simple.

No, I know.  My point was that this question seems to come up rather frequently,
and the answer is more or less always "Here's the licensing terms<link>, and
here's what it basically means: <several paragraph explanation>".  Replacing
<several paragraph explanation> with <link> seems like a win for everyone.

>  I wouldn't want someone making the decision to release
> a cygwin product based on a FAQ entry.

Well, I see that there already is a FAQ entry on this:
But I'd say your explanation is as I said more concise and clear.  But whatever.

Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer.  Patriot.

Unsubscribe info:
Bug reporting:

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]