Re: Is GCC buggy ?

[Randall R Schulz <rrschulz at cris dot com>]

Jean-Raymond,

For practical purposes, no, GCC is not "buggy." Which is not to say it is 
bug-free. No large software program is literally bug-free.

Nonetheless, I compiled your program and it did what one would expect. No 
fireworks:

DEBUT
dans p:4198551 azerty
FIN


% gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.2 20020927 (prerelease)

% cygcheck -c gcc
Cygwin Package Information
Package             Version
gcc                 3.2-3


Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA

P.S. In the future, please place your cygcheck output in an attachment. I 
helps control clutter in the mailing list archives and reduces false hits 
when people perform package-, library- or program-specific searches of the 
archives.

Likewise for cygcheck output. In this case, compression is usually called 
for (use "bzip2") and even without it, putting the content in an attachment 
protects against line wrapping.


At 06:55 2002-11-20, CHAUVIERE Jean-Raymond wrote:
> When I compile a source defining a function and calling it, the program 
> coredumps.
>
> I already compiled on this machine using 2.95. This happens since the 
> update gcc 3.2 I fully reinstall cygwin (today: 11/20/2002 at 14h:00( 
> PARIS/FRANCE) packages from programming.ccp14.uk), the same always 
> happens. What I compiled, rox file manager for instance, is always functional.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/