Re: ls problem

["Carlo Florendo" <carlo at astra dot ph>]

I don't know how to interpret the output of strace so I just included it
here as ls-output.bz2.  I hope this helps us see the problem.

Thanks!


----- Original Message -----
From: "Randall R Schulz" <rrschulz@cris.com>
To: <cygwin@cygwin.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: ls problem


> Carlo,
>
> I think your next step must be to run "ls" under "strace" and see where
the
> excess time (presumably idle time) is going.
>
> Randall Schulz
> Mountain View, CA USA
>
>
> At 17:00 2002-11-19, Carlo Florendo wrote:
> >Hi Igor,
> >
> >I tried disabling ntsec and "ls -l" is still slow.  I'm using
> >1.3.15-cygwin-1-3-15-1.  "ls -l" and "ls -ln" takes almost the same
amount
> >of time.    On a directory with 3 short text files, the difference, when
I
> >timed "ls -l" and "ls -b", is still considerable.
> >
> >fcarlo@ZEUS~
> >$ time ls -b
> >a  b  test
> >
> >real    0m0.024s
> >user    0m0.030s
> >sys     0m0.015s
> >
> >fcarlo@ZEUS ~
> >$ time ls -l
> >total 11
> >-rw-r--r--    1 fcarlo   None            5 Nov 19 13:58 a
> >-rw-r--r--    1 fcarlo   None            5 Nov 19 13:58 b
> >-rw-r--r--    1 fcarlo   None         8283 Nov 19 13:59 test
> >
> >real    0m1.819s
> >user    0m0.030s
> >sys     0m0.000s
> >
> >Best Regards,
> >
> >Carlo Florendo
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>

Attachment: ls-output.bz2
Description: Binary data

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/