Re: binutils 20021107-2

[Charles Wilson <cwilson at ece dot gatech dot edu>]

Robert Collins wrote:

> On Sat, 2002-11-09 at 21:59, Danny Smith wrote:
>
> > Hello Robert
> >
> > By default symbols in libstdc++.a are excluded when doing --export-all, to
> > protect against this type of error.
> >
> > However, ld/pe-dll.c knows nothing about libstdc++-2.a.  So those symbols do
> > get exported ... and cause the usual problems with multiple definitions.
> >
> > Quick solution: Try --exclude-libs=libstdc++-2.a
> Got it in one. Should this be in the g++-2 specs?

Nope.  Chris should apply the attached patch to binutils and re-release. 
 It's surprising we didn't catch this when gcc-3.x/gcc2-2.95 were 
getting their shakedown this summer.  Oh well.

Also, Chris, you could take the opportunity of binutils-20021107-3 to 
apply Egor's remaining patches...  :-)

--Chuck

Index: pe-dll.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/ld/pe-dll.c,v
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -r1.45 pe-dll.c
--- pe-dll.c	6 Nov 2002 19:36:20 -0000	1.45
+++ pe-dll.c	9 Nov 2002 17:27:42 -0000
@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@
 static struct sec *edata_s, *reloc_s;
 static unsigned char *edata_d, *reloc_d;
 static size_t edata_sz, reloc_sz;
+static int runtime_pseudo_relocs_created = 0;
 
 typedef struct
   {
@@ -234,6 +235,8 @@
   { "libg2c.", 7 },
   { "libsupc++.", 10 },
   { "libobjc.", 8 },
+  { "libstdc++-2.", 12 },
+  { "libg2c-2.", 9 },
   { NULL, 0 }
 };
 

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/