This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Crontab problems
- From: Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha at cs dot nyu dot edu>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 12:28:33 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: Crontab problems
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> --- Raphael <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Great but without any C knowledge I wouldn't even know where to start.
> > I'm wondering, if Corinne is reading this, if the patch might not be
> > standarized for Cygwin considering the interchangability between
> > Cygwin and Windows. Ofcourse only if there is really no security
> > issue.
> > > Boy, I get to quote the source a lot these days... Not that I'm
> > > complaining or anything... :-D
> > I'm sure everyone is very greatfull for you sharing this information.
> > It's considarably more informative than a blunt ŽUse vi.exeŽ some
> > people try to kill a thread with. Thank you very much.
> Paul Vixie last released cron in freakin' 1994 (or thereabouts)! Not
> much has been done to modify it since then. I'm sure his design was
> quite appropriate at the time, when the thought of using a gui editor
> to edit cron jobs was unheard of. The point is: why make life
> difficult for yourself? If you want a lazy editor, use nano or pico
> for crying out loud! They're so easy my grandmother could use them.
> Trying to use Windows NotePad, which introduces the whole \r\n deal,
> is friggin' crazy! Why should Corinna, or anyone else for that
> matter, patch the *working* cron sources just for *you* when there
> are perfectly good tools already available? I'm sorry my friend, but
> this isn't Burger King, where you can have it your way right away. I
> applaud Igor for being generous and doing the research for you, but I
> don't think you should expect it every time. I think you read too
> much into "use vi". It was simply providing a sensible alternative
> to Windows NotePad which provides the same functionality without the
> need for modifing *working* sources. If that doesn't suit you,
> TextPad looks like a viable alternative...
Not to step on anyone's toes (and I really do want to correct this just
for the archives), but EditPad ( http://www.editpadpro.com/ ) offers a
nice alternative to Notepad, and can handle UNIX-style newlines. It even
has a "go to line" feature for programmers. I don't use it to edit
crontabs, but I did use it for perl programs, with great results.
Not all Windows editors are bad. Sorry, couldn't resist giving it a plug.
|\ _,,,---,,_ email@example.com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ firstname.lastname@example.org
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
"Water molecules expand as they grow warmer" (C) Popular Science, Oct'02, p.51
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html