This is the mail archive of the cygwin@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re[2]: Rebase 1.5-1: Causes invalid page fault


JT> On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 06:04:31PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>> You printed just the first argument.  There is a total of 11 arguments
>> to this function.
>> 
>> BOOL ReBaseImage(
>>   PSTR CurrentImageName,  
>>   PSTR SymbolPath,      
>>   BOOL fReBase,          
>>   BOOL fRebaseSysfileOk,  
>>   BOOL fGoingDown,       
>>   ULONG CheckImageSize,  
>>   ULONG *OldImageSize,  
>>   ULONG_PTR *OldImageBase,  
JT>          ^^^^
JT>          ****
>>   ULONG *NewImageSize,  
>>   ULONG_PTR *NewImageBase,  
JT>          ^^^^
JT>          ****
>>   ULONG TimeStamp        
>> );

JT> The ULONG_PTR above is causing me some concern.  Note that the above
JT> signature does *not* agree with the header file (either MinGW or MSVC)
JT> and I cannot find the definition of ULONG_PTR.  Is the above a typo in
JT> the MSDN or are OldImageBase and NewImageBase really suppose to be a
JT> pointer to pointer?

The above is from help library that is coming with the downloadable
Platform SDK. It is dated November, 2001.

I just grepped /usr/include/w32api:

./basetsd.h:100:typedef  unsigned long ULONG_PTR, *PULONG_PTR;

So it is not a pointer to pointer. They have chosen a strange name
though :)


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]