Re: Bug in setup.exe 2.194.2.24

[Michael A Chase <mchase at ix dot netcom dot com>]

On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 18:01:34 -0400 Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 08:33:02PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:

> >setup.exe should know what it's downloaded and not installed.
> 
> Yep.  I thought I added code to do that in the previous version but
> it's been so long that I'm not sure.
> 
> And, (bwahaha) I don't have time to look into this myself right now.
> 
> However, if Robert indicates that this is not the desired behavior
> then maybe someone else (*cough*, Michael, *cough*) might have time
> to look into this?

I'll look into it this evening.  Not sure if I'll be able to figure it out
though.  I seem to have trouble leaving the old procedural paradigm.
-- 
Mac :})
** I normally forward private questions to the appropriate mail list. **
Ask Smarter: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.htm
Give a hobbit a fish and he eats fish for a day.
Give a hobbit a ring and he eats fish for an age.



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/