This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
RE: fastcall for gcc
- From: "Robert Collins" <robert dot collins at itdomain dot com dot au>
- To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 09:12:46 +1000
- Subject: RE: fastcall for gcc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf@redhat.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 9:12 AM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: fastcall for gcc
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:08:28AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf@redhat.com]
> >> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 9:07 AM
> >> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> >> Subject: Re: fastcall for gcc
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:01:18AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >> >would you accept a patch to give cygwin gcc FASTCALL support?
> >>
> >> Um, talk to Danny about this. I think he's already got
> >> something along these lines.
> >
> >He does, it's the work Danny did with the ReactOS group that
> I'd like
> >to make available in cygwin. For purely selfish reasons -
> I'd like to
> >be able to cross compile Reactos without YACOG on my system.
>
> You don't need another compiler, then. Just use the one
> you've built yourself.
Which doesn't have your tweaks to gcc.
There are other applications for FASTCALL support, including building NT
device drivers and so forth.
Anyway, should I take this as
"No, cygwin gcc doesn't need FASTCALL"?
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/