This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: CVS with pserver: Binary files get corrupted
- From: Charles Wilson <cwilson at ece dot gatech dot edu>
- To: Holger Spielmann <holger at spielmann dot net>
- Cc: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:58:14 -0500
- Subject: Re: CVS with pserver: Binary files get corrupted
- References: <email@example.com>
Holger Spielmann wrote:
> due to company policy, I have to use Windows in my current project, so
> I started using Cygwin to get a halfway decent environment.
> I successfully managed to set up a CVS pserver on Cygwin. In our
> project, we want to add some JAR files to the CVS, so the frameworks
> API (here: Cocoon) can be assured to be on the same revision for all
> But the jars arrive garbled in the repository, despite I added them
> with the -kb option. First I thought it might be related to the text
> mode I used for mounting the file systems, but transferring the
> repository didn't change anything, I even tried to import a new
> project from scratch.
The repository itself must be on a binary (unix) mounted drive -- within
the conext of the service! Since you are probably starting the pserver
daemon from inetd, which is started under the *SYSTEM* user. It
(probably) doesn't matter where the checked-out or original-pre-import
sources are, but the repository must be on a unix mount.
Try starting from scratch:
On repository machine:
mount -b -s D:\my-repository /repository
(-s insures that this is a whole-system mount, so even the SYSTEM user
will see it)
And then try importing a new project.
[not snipped so your entire message appears in the correct mailing list archives]
> For all binary files, linefeed is replaced by CR/LF, and yes, it
> already happens when the files arrive in the repository.
> As I read in an older posting by Corinna Vinschen concerning ash,
> dated from April 2001, this might be related to the cvs pserver
> process opening its socket with O_TEXT. Alas, grepping thru the
> sources of cvs and inetutils showed me no place where I might try to
> Using rsh is no opportunity because we get dynamic IPs, using ssh
> with client certificates would involve additional software and
> procedures, to which some of my collegues are not used to, and putting
> the repository on a Windows share is too damn slow and lacks any
> Ah, and did I mention the policy keeps me from just putting Debian on
> one of the boxes... :(
> Any ideas regarding this problem? A patch would be quite handy!
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html