This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
-mno-cygwin with newer GCC?
- From: "David Abrahams" <david dot abrahams at rcn dot com>
- To: <cygwin at cygwin dot com>
- Cc: "David Abrahams" <david dot abrahams at rcn dot com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:41:05 -0500
- Subject: -mno-cygwin with newer GCC?
- Reply-to: "David Abrahams" <david dot abrahams at rcn dot com>
Request: If you can remember to, please reply to me personally in addition
to sending your reply to the cygwin list. Thanks!
I'm trying to use -mno-cygwin with a Cygwin GCC-3.0.2 that I built from
sources. It seems that there are some preprocessor symbol definitions
missing, for example:
_U=01 _L=02 _N=04 _S=010 _P=020 _C=040 _X=0100 _B=0200 // for ctype_base
it gets the wrong definition of
et. al. from std_cmath.
Is there a way to make this work?
It seems to me that the MINGW community (and Cygwin for that matter) is
pretty committed to gcc-2.95.x, but I want the improved C++ compiler
available with 3.0.2. Is anyone out there doing a similar thing, or am I
completely out on a limb?
David Abrahams, C++ library designer for hire
C++ Booster (http://www.boost.org)
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html