This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: experimental texmf packages
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Do we already have -src packages that adhere to this new convention?
Yep. mktemp. automake, automake-devel, automake-stable, autoconf,
autoconf-devel, autoconf-stable, cygutils, ...
> If it's not too late, it would be very nice if they could be
> distinguished from the old, prepatched -src packages, by using a
> different naming convention, ie foo-1.1-cyg.tar.gz?
probably too late -- and besides, I don't think setup/upset are prepared
for source packages that don't end in -src. But why should they be
distinguished? It's up to the maintainer of each package to keep
track...non-maintainers who want to build it personally should just
download and follow the instructions.
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html