This is the mail archive of the
cygwin@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Periodic plea for someone to work on cygwin docs
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Subject: Re: Periodic plea for someone to work on cygwin docs
- From: Edmund Horner <ejrh at paradise dot net dot nz>
- Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 14:20:09 +1200
- References: <20010921143948.A3617@redhat.com>
I am looking for a way to make a positive contribution (as opposed to
asking stupid questions of the list, of which I have been occassionally
guilty...). Part of my work responsibility is technical documentation,
so I have some idea of the kind of technical research that's necessary
to update these sorts of documents.
Unfortunately I don't know much about either CVS or SGML, though of
course I could learn.
If the major requirement is simply someone who can write and has the
time to do so, then I think I can help. If you think this is a
possibility, I will re-familiarise myself with the docs and think
further on it.
Edmund.
> I periodically ask if anyone is interested in helping out with cygwin
> documentation.
>
> We need people to pull things from the FAQ into the documentation and
> to generally improve what is currently available.
>
> Unfortunately, I have very little understanding of what is required to
> build the current documentation. It is written in sgml and uses
> some tools that need to be downloaded from the net. That is about
> as much as I know.
>
> So, the problem is that I can't offer much guidance about what is
> required to actually make the documentation. It should be possible to
> figure out what is required from the archives, though. I can help with
> content, of course. The whole cygwin mailing list can help with this,
> in fact.
>
> If anyone is interested in doing this, I'll provide them with CVS access
> to the cygwin repository which would allow them to update cygwin
> documentation.
>
> I can also provide access to the cygwin web pages so that the
> documentation can be updated there. This happens automatically from
> CVS.
>
> Anyone interested? I've asked this this question before and I think
> I've had some nibbles but I haven't seen any activity on this front.
> It is a shame that a project which is the size of cygwin doesn't have
> anyone actively working on documentation (besides the FAQ, of course).
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/