This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: mailing list uniqueness/request (NOT GOING TO HAPPEN)
- To: cygwin at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: mailing list uniqueness/request (NOT GOING TO HAPPEN)
- From: Chris Faylor <cgf at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 11:28:50 -0400
- References: <3909A983.AD2A0C2@home.com> <Pine.LNX.3.96.1000428111236.22288Cfirstname.lastname@example.org>
- Reply-To: cygwin at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 11:17:08AM -0400, The Little Prince wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, David A. Cobb wrote:
>> Please allow me to add my vote in favor. [CW] however could be
>> ambiguous, [cygwin] would be better. In general the [www-] lists do
>> this as do [PDF-] lists. It's a BIG help when sifting thru the 300
>> 'grams a day I get from the tech lists I watch.
>yeah, i thought of [cygwin] too, just thought it would cut off more of the
>subject in the Pine index than it would need to, i really dont know how
>many people use pine, i'm just just speaking for me. and yes, i know, i
>could just configure pine to do something comparable, like change the
>index-format setting to put the sender: header somewhere in the
>index listing, but I didn't feel like it, and it makes my listing look
>weird from what i've been used to for 5 years.
>if you do it, great..if not, fine too, i'm not gonna commit suicide or
There is no need to continue this thread. We will not be mangling the
subject for this mailing list. That is completely and irrevocably final.
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to email@example.com