This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
GNU emacs fonts again
- From: Marc Girod <marc dot girod at gmail dot com>
- To: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 04:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: GNU emacs fonts again
- Reply-to: cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com
Hello,
My last cygwin upgrade changed the fonts used in GNU emacs.
This is:
xorg-server 1.6.3-1 OK
emacs 23.1-10 OK
cygwin 1.7.0-61 OK
font-alias 1.0.1-1 OK
Until now, I belive I was using:
font-bh-lucidatypewriter-dpi75 1.0.0-1 OK
I get now under emacs:
(list-fontsets)
Fontset: -*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-fontset-default
Fontset: -*-fixed-medium-r-normal-*-16-*-*-*-*-*-fontset-standard
Fontset: -monotype-Courier
New-normal-normal-normal-*-12-*-*-*-*-0-fontset-startup
In fact, I might be happy with 'Courier New' (fixed fonts anyway!) if it
wasn't for one glitch:
the bold font is narrower than the normal one!?
In my emacs shell, the command is in bold once you have run it, but not
while you edit it.
It means that the command you edit doesn't align with the previous one which
failed,
and which you are just fixing.
Of the two widths, I prefer the narrower one (I find the width/height ratio
of the medium
Courier New less readable).
So, may I align the widths?
Thanks,
Marc
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/GNU-emacs-fonts-again-tp25678987p25678987.html
Sent from the cygwin-xfree mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/
FAQ: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/