This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-xfree@cygwin.com
mailing list for the Cygwin XFree86 project.
RE: xc/config/cf/cygwin.rules - ComplexProgramTarget_1
- To: "Suhaib Siddiqi" <ssiddiqi at inspirepharm dot com>, "'Alan Hourihane'" <alanh at fairlite dot demon dot co dot uk>, "'cygx'" <cygwin-xfree at cygwin dot com>
- Subject: RE: xc/config/cf/cygwin.rules - ComplexProgramTarget_1
- From: "Harold Hunt" <huntharo at msu dot edu>
- Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 00:27:30 -0400
> I downloaded code from CVS. I noticed my cygwin.rules patches were not
> applied. It had fixes for building Xrandr DLLs and a few other
> fixes beside
> the .exe issue you just fixed. I resent my cygwin.rules patch just now to
> patches at xfree86.org.
Most of Suhaib's patch 4908 is not needed and should not be applied, as
ComplexProgramTarget_2 and _3 use the defaults now, while
ComplexProgramTarget_1 uses a new dependency scheme that requires the
default rules for _2 through _10. Using the rule versions in said patch
will give us a mix of the situations prior to and after the fix for
ComplexProgramTarget_1.
Also, the only change that 4908 has to ComplexProgramTarget_1 is a change to
the comment block that deviates from the standard used throughout the file.
Furthermore, there is a #if 0'd new rule, ComplexProgramTargetNoMan, with no
comments on why it is #if 0'd.
Harold