This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk
mailing list for the cygwin project.
3PPs (Was Re: multiple cygwin installs (gold star))
- From: Igor Peshansky <pechtcha at cs dot nyu dot edu>
- To: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 09:30:38 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: 3PPs (Was Re: multiple cygwin installs (gold star))
- References: <84952F09F3FC0C418393E60D116EB9CC1815F0@Traf-Mail.int.ascribe.com> <20070329121041.GA27202@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0703290926400.16297@access1.cims.nyu.edu>
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Maiming List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Igor Peshansky wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:34:07PM +0100, Phil Betts wrote:
> > ><soapbox>
> > >Any 3PP that forces one to use their (inevitably out of date) version
> > >of cygwin (and thereby killing the official installation) is IMO broken
> > >and the issue should be taken up with them. At the very least, it
> > >shows they have such little faith in their own software's robustness
> > >that they won't risk it running on an newer version of cygwin.
> > >
> > >Imagine the chaos if ALL software was installed like this. You might
> > >end up with 100 different versions of cygwin on your PC, and ProductA
> > >would never be able to talk to ProductB because they'd need two
> > >different sets of registry settings simultaneously.
> > >
> > >I'm sure their justification is that they are reducing support costs
> > >by ensuring it's running on a known platform. Only if their customer
> > >support is forced to resolve the problems caused by their installation
> > >will they learn that this is a false economy.
> > ></soapbox>
> >
> > Nicely put. Can I get a gold star over here?
>
> <http://cygwin.com/goldstars/#PB>
> Igor
After including the link to the definition of 3PPs on the description of
that gold star, I realized how easily lost the definition is -- it's
sitting at the very end of a long file, and thus does not end up at the
top of the screen when the link is followed.
Relative sorting order of numbers and letters being a constant point of
contention, I wonder if I shouldn't just move 3PP to be the first acronym
in the OLOCA... It would certainly present a nice perspective to anyone
just browsing it.
Igor
--
http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
|\ _,,,---,,_ pechtcha@cs.nyu.edu | igor@watson.ibm.com
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ Igor Peshansky, Ph.D. (name changed!)
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' old name: Igor Pechtchanski
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-. Meow!
Freedom is just another word for "nothing left to lose"... -- Janis Joplin