This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-talk@cygwin.com
mailing list for the cygwin project.
RE: Serious performance problems (malloc related?)
- From: "Gary R. Van Sickle" <g dot r dot vansickle at worldnet dot att dot net>
- To: <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 22:49:46 -0500
- Subject: RE: Serious performance problems (malloc related?)
- Reply-to: The Cygwin-Talk Maligning List <cygwin-talk at cygwin dot com>
Carlo Florendo wrote:
>
> Can't you teach your mailer to behave?
> http://www.cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR
> This has been told to you, IIRC, many times.
>
Carlos, the list's own email adresses themselves are of little use to a
harvester, since, if they are going to be harvesting from a list, they sort
of by definition already have the list's own address. And if they didn't
already have it, they'd get it from here:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-talk/2005-q2/. However, I'll get rid of them
just this once per your request (though of course I can't remove it from
that web page, making such an action fairly meaningless). So don't say I
never did nothin' for ya.
[snip]
> >
> >In his latest statement on the topic,
> >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-talk/2005-q2/msg00279.html, he mentions
> >nothing about "fun".
> >
>
> Yes, he doesn't.
QED.
[snip]
> >
> >Nobody is discussing such posts, not me anyway. Why do you
> and some others
> >(one other?) believe any of this chronic issue is related to
> pointing people
> >to web pages? I truly don't follow.
> >
> >
> >
>
> You know why? Because it's fun. :)
>
> And it helps people to help themselves. If you don't
> understand that, I
> can't imagine what you can?
>
I think I've just been maligned.
--
Gary R. Van Sickle