This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-patches
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [PATCH RFC] fork: reduce chances for "address space is already occupied" errors
- From: Brian Inglis <Brian dot Inglis at SystematicSw dot ab dot ca>
- To: cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com
- Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 08:57:52 -0600
- Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] fork: reduce chances for "address space is already occupied" errors
- References: <0f0d7cd6-e770-fc32-f28f-817b700e4d87@SystematicSw.ab.ca> <f5ab5a82-8d26-4898-7ea4-ecef5c377299@ssi-schaefer.com> <abf543bb-e8df-9eeb-5ae8-63e5d59cca9a@SystematicSw.ab.ca> <87sgv65eyc.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <5fa27e1c-a790-f03d-b4b3-1985f26df128@SystematicSw.ab.ca> <87pnq9jupk.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <a83dedc6-ea5b-5fc9-4bbc-f06a9cf19472@SystematicSw.ab.ca> <878sww93g9.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <97aec921-d9b1-3b0e-de7a-d492832ba481@SystematicSw.ab.ca> <236d3269-1b0b-9da0-9816-ed84e489f73e@ssi-schaefer.com> <20190403122648.GY3337@calimero.vinschen.de> <1ba74039-5ab5-aa09-2d86-24bf761885e0@ssi-schaefer.com>
- Reply-to: Brian dot Inglis at SystematicSw dot ab dot ca
On 2019-04-08 06:38, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> On 4/3/19 2:26 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Apr 3 12:38, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>>> Furthermore, with so called "Stacked Prefix", it is possible to have a second
>>> level of Gentoo Prefix, so what I'm after is some option to tell the rebase
>>> utility which database to record dll base addresses into, and which multiple(!)
>>> databases take into account while performing a rebase.
>> rebase is OSS.
> Yeah, and I have found the git repo so far. But I'm wondering if distfiles like
> "cygwin-rebase-4.4.4.tar.bz2" are already available somewhere more persistent
> than via the current Cygwin distro source package "rebase-4.4.4-1-src.tar.xz"?
http://www.crouchingtigerhiddenfruitbat.org/Cygwin/timemachine.html
as long as that is around: dependent on health, and ability to fund, of one guy,
Peter Castro, like some of the software we use.
--
Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains
too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised.