This is the mail archive of the cygwin-patches@cygwin.com mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives

From: "Pierre A. Humblet" <pierre at phumblet dot no-ip dot org>
To: <cygwin-patches at cygwin dot com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 15:49:21 -0400
Subject: Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives
References: <3.0.5.32.20050509201636.00b4e7b8@incoming.verizon.net><3.0.5.32.20050505225708.00b64250@incoming.verizon.net><3.0.5.32.20050509201636.00b4e7b8@incoming.verizon.net><3.0.5.32.20050510205301.00b4b658@incoming.verizon.net><20050511085307.GA2805@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-to: "Pierre A. Humblet" <Pierre dot Humblet at ieee dot org>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Corinna Vinschen" <corinna-cygwin@cygwin.com>
To: <cygwin-patches@cygwin.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 4:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives


> I don't like the idea of isrofs being an inline function in dir.cc.
> Wouldn't that be better a method in path_conv?  It would be helpful
> for other functions, too.  For instance, unlink and symlink_worker.
> In the (not so) long run we should really move all of these functions
> into the fhandlers, though.

After looking into it, moving mkdir and rmdir to fhandlers should be
quite simple. I will do that early next week.

Pierre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives
  - From: Christopher Faylor

References:
- Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives
  - From: Pierre A. Humblet
- [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives
  - From: Pierre A. Humblet
- Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives
  - From: Pierre A. Humblet
- Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives
  - From: Corinna Vinschen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]