Re: /proc and /proc/registry

["Chris January" <chris at atomice dot net>]

> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 07:31:04PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 12:11:26AM -0000, Chris January wrote:
> >>> >>>The attached patch (against cygwin-1.3.9-1/winsup/cygwin) adds
support
> >>> >>>for a /proc virtual filesystem and a read-only version of
> >>> >>>/proc/registry.  I've read http://cygwin.com/assign.txt but need to
> >>> >>>sort out the legalese before doing anything.  Partically fufills
Cygwin
> >>> >>>TODO item:
> >>> >>>2001-11-08    /proc filesystem    Nicos
> >>> >>I wish I could get people to look at sending in an assigment
*before*
> >>> >>they start doing work.  It would save a lot of time, I think.
> >>> >Can you please verify if you have received the copyright assignment
> >>> >form or not.
> >>>
> >>> I haven't heard anything.  I notify cygwin-patches and
cygwin-developers
> >>> when I hear that I've received an assignment from our main office.
> >>>
> >>> Just to verify, you had both you and your employer send a release
form,
> >>> right?
> >>
> >>I work as a consultant and I am the sole claimant to the copyright.
> >
> >That's good news.
> >
> >Boy, I hate this part.  This waiting for an assignment part is a real
roadblock
> >to development.  I apologize for the necessity of having to go through
this.
>
> We have the assignment!
>
> Please resubmit your patch against current CVS sources.
Please find patch against today's CVS attached.
> I'll investigate in more detail now that I am unemcumbered.

Regards
Chris

Attachment: ChangeLog
Description: Binary data

Attachment: proc.patch
Description: Binary data