This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: help/version patches
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 01:23:51PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>Well, cygpath is wrong. cygcheck is wrong too, under this scenario,
>but not quite as wrong since it at leasts puts the version in its own
>string. I believe, it used to do something similar to cygpath but I
>changed it, intending to, someday, make it use cvs versions.
Sorry, I forgot to use the word "IMO" in the above. Obviously there are
one of many ways to do this. I think the "const char version" at the
top and cvs id in the version is the best. However, I'm guilty of doing
it the "wrong" way myself.