This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Separate packages for completion scripts?
- From: Andrew Schulman <schulman dot andrew at epa dot gov>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 09:38:51 -0500
- Subject: Re: Separate packages for completion scripts?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20160225100504 dot GD29016 at dinwoodie dot org>
> Seeking opinions from other package maintainers: is it desirable to have
> Bash (et al.) completion scripts as part of the main package they're
> associated with, or should they be packaged separately?
It seems simpler and completely reasonable to me to include the completion
scripts as part of the main package.
I agree that it must be rare for someone to want bash-completion and some
other package, but not the bash completion for that package. Many more
people will be inconvenienced by having to install a separate
foo-completion package.
Andrew