This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [ITP] Inetutils 1.9.4
- From: "D. Boland" <daniel at boland dot nl>
- To: Cygwin applications <cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 07:56:04 +0100
- Subject: Re: [ITP] Inetutils 1.9.4
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <56B78518 dot 2000209 at boland dot nl> <20160208140438 dot GJ27646 at calimero dot vinschen dot de>
Hi Corinna,
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 7 18:55, D. Boland wrote:
Hi group,
At Corinna's request, I re-intend to package the new version of Inetutils,
version 1.9.4:
http://cygwin.boland.nl/x86_64/release/inetutils/inetutils-1.9.4-2-src.tar.xz
[...]
Some programs in the inetutils suite are packaged already:
* hostname
* whois
* tftp
* tftp-server
So I added these on the 'required' lines.
They are not actually *required* to run inetd, right? Does it really
make sense to add them as require packages then?
They belong to the package. A user expects them in there and would have
to piece the package back together. Why does it make sense to leave them
out?
Also, the following include files are needed:
* /usr/include/netinet/icmp6.h
* /usr/include/netinet/ip_var.h
There has been discussion on including the icmp6.h file in Cygwin 2.3.0.
Can you check if icmp6.h from FreeBSD
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/netinet/icmp6.h?revision=279531&view=co
does the trick when copied to /usr/include/netinet? If so, I add this file
to the repo.
If I use the FreeBSD version I get:
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../lib -I../lib
-I../libinetutils -I../libicmp -O2 -pipe
-Wimplicit-function-declaration -MT ping6.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/ping6.Tpo
-c -o ping6.o ping6.c
ping6.c: In function 'ping_init':
ping6.c:844:37: error: 'ICMP6_FILTER' undeclared (first use in this
function)
setsockopt (fd, IPPROTO_ICMPV6, ICMP6_FILTER, &filter, sizeof
(filter));
^
Daniel