This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 6/12/2013 10:50 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 2013-06-12 14:08, Charles Wilson wrote:However, in actuality, neither Bruno's "gettext-runtime" (our gettext) nor his "gettext-tools" (our gettext-devel) really represent a "traditional" runtime-vs-devel split. Note that this means all of the following: /usr/lib/libintl.a /usr/lib/libintl.dll.a /usr/lib/libintl.la /usr/include/libintl.h are actually in 'gettext' and *not* in gettext-devel.IMO they really should be in the latter; if you're building a package which uses l10n, you need it anyway for autopoint, msgfmt, etc.
Right, which is why gettext-devel *should* (and on 32bit, does) depend on gettext.
However, I'll investigate how the linux distros package gettext & co. It's possible TRTD is to have libintl-devel, libasprintf-devel, libgettextpo-devel, etc...and (most of) gettext-devel is transferred to gettext-tools. As I said, I'll investigate.
-- Chuck
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |