This is the mail archive of the
cygwin-apps
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [PATCH] Stop automatic dependency selection on setup.exe chooser screen
- From: Andy Koppe <andy dot koppe at gmail dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 20:05:24 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Stop automatic dependency selection on setup.exe chooser screen
- References: <AANLkTileEcuy80itJgpZxn0R_X-Uio2eHjV5BLLphHXO@mail.gmail.com> <20100723031137.GA1475@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <AANLkTindzUKOzf0Ajp2B6aw9MqM9Ncl1VQVu-0ehtOry@mail.gmail.com> <20100723045931.GB1475@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <AANLkTikmlGUWf5itS-w9EbflG2rIFux1CKxu1EnPcDIs@mail.gmail.com> <20100723102208.GA2570@calimero.vinschen.de> <AANLkTikdrVV_i6HbxvWWfq4bpTe1RD=B=oCOy+V9R7tF@mail.gmail.com> <20100726084118.GB12672@calimero.vinschen.de> <AANLkTikX6qUYF10PYwakMoYxa2035JDVV3RDSK-GGJOf@mail.gmail.com> <20100805081805.GA12249@calimero.vinschen.de> <20100805154206.GC26419@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
On 5 August 2010 16:42, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> How about this?
>>>
>>> ======
>>> Unmet Dependencies Found [in bold]
>>> The following packages are required to meet dependencies.
>>
>>I would prefer "satisfy" instead of "meet". ÂBut it doesn't matter.
>>Just go ahead.
>
> I also find "meet" unsatisfying and think that "satisfy" would be better
> wording.
>
> If you agree and want to meet those requirements then I think we're
> satisfied and you can check that in.
Done, with one small additional tweak: 'Select required packages'
instead of 'Install required packages', because the dialog also
appears when trying to uninstall packages that are still needed. Hope
that's ok.
Andy