This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: [HEADSUP] Let's start a Cygwin 1.7 release area
2008/4/15, Corinna Vinschen:
> On Apr 15 10:17, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > I also object to using "Red Hat" as the "owner" [...]
> Red Hat *is* the owner of the code, regardless of the registry key you
> want to use. I know that you have mixed feelings about Red Hat,
> however, assuming the code is owned by the FSF, would you object against
> a parent key name of FSF as well?
Cannot we just use just "Cygwin" as the most obvious choice.
We really don't have to use some artificial company name.