This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Setup - Hiding ZZZRemovedPackages?
- From: Brian Dessent <brian at dessent dot net>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 22:13:56 -0700
- Subject: Re: Setup - Hiding ZZZRemovedPackages?
- References: <427C4AD5.email@example.com>
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Would it be possible to hide the ZZZRemovedPackages category when in
> Category view, without changing the dependency logic regarding this
Yes, in fact I've been meaning to bring this up. In terms of the end
user, there should be no reason at all for them to see those packages,
and I think it would be a good idea in general to remove them from sight
The only worry I have is that if someone still has an ancient version of
a package installed, they would no longer see it even though it's
installed. Of course, if they just ran setup and accepted all the
defaults they would get the new version of the package, without having
to see them to select them. But I do wonder about those users (and I
know they're out there) that insist on running 3 year old versions of
I was thinking about making it a checkbox at the bottom of the dialog,
that said "Hide obsolete packages" and defaults to checked. If the user
unchecks it they would get the same display they get now.
> Also, would it be possible to sort this category to the bottom of the
> list in all other views and ignore it when calculating the width to use
> for the Categories column? Currently the Categories column is too wide
> and scrunches the Package column because of the length of the
> ZZZRemovedPackages category name.
That would be another way of doing it. I'm not sure how easy or hard it
would be to make them sort down to the bottom though. And I'd prefer to
get rid of them entirely.