This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: DJB licensing issues [Was: [ITP] mhash-0.9.1-1]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 6 11:20, Lapo Luchini wrote:
>> I guess an email to DJB could clarify it a bit...
> It's essential to do this. A source code with no copyright or
> licensing information at all is highly lawless ground. Dunno about
> other countries but in Germany a source code is not just public
> domain because the author didn't add a copyright notice. On the
I guess I will actualyl send the email, out of curiosity if not for
any other reason...
Well actually I guess i found the correct page (it talks about djbdns
excplicitly), and it falls under the hat of the generic "DJB license":
feel free to download and do whatever you like, but you may distribute
binary "only if".
In the specific:
> You may distribute a precompiled package if
> * installing your package produces /exactly/ the same files, in
> exactly the same locations, that a user would obtain by
> installing one of my packages listed above;
> * your package behaves correctly, i.e., the same way as normal
> installations of my package on all other systems; and
> * your package's creator warrants that he has made a good-faith
> attempt to ensure that your package behaves correctly.
> All installations must work the same way; any variation is a bug. If
> there's something about a system (compiler, libraries, kernel,
> hardware, whatever) that changes the behavior of my package, then that
> platform is /not/ supported, and you are /not/ permitted to distribute
> binaries for it.
> You may distribute an operating system that includes a precompiled
> package under the same rules.
email@example.com (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----