This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Pending Packages List, 2003-10-17

On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 02:31:34PM -0400, Daniel Reed wrote:
> On 2003-10-17T19:34+0200, Daniel Boesswetter wrote:
> ) >Package: tcm 2.20-1
> ) >Description: Toolkit for Conceptual Modeling (TCM)
> ) >   Proposer: Daniel Boesswetter
> ) >   Proposal:
> ) >   
> ) >   
> ) >   
> ) >   Problems: If this does fall under cygwin-apps since it is not an "X package" but a "package that requires X", should the package be recreated with prefix set to /usr instead of /usr/X11R6? (cygwin-apps-get.11645)
> ) >
> ) _This_is_no_problem_. As we found out in
> ), X-apps are
> ) supposed to live under /usr/X11R6. I won't rebuild the package unless
> ) something more serious is found.
> Binaries and libraries are under /usr/X11R6/, but it appears anything that
> would be "shared" between potential X-only and non-X versions of the package
> should be prefixed in /usr (i.e. man pages should be in /usr/share/man
> instead of /usr/X11R6/man or /usr/X11R6/share/man).

I don't think so.  The X11 packages are prefixed to /usr/X11 entirely.
Ther's no need to move stuff from /usr/X11R6/share to /usr/share.


Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                      
Red Hat, Inc.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]