This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: Proposal: psutils (again)
- From: Elfyn McBratney <elfyn at emcb dot co dot uk>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 12:03:04 +0100 (BST)
- Subject: Re: Proposal: psutils (again)
- Reply-to: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Daniel Bößwetter wrote:
> Hi Volker,
> Volker Quetschke wrote:
> > [...]
> > Well, beside the fact that you don't provide a patch to restore the
> > original source archive. This is the main (?) reason to provide the
> > patch, it is there to get back the official sources.
> Grr @!%$, forgot to put it into the source archive again :) Fixed.
> > The original source archive contains a Makefile, which you removed.
> No, mine doesn't. The original download site for psutils seems to be
> down for the past few days, so I got the source from a mirror. It did
> not contain a file named Makefile. Does your's?
> BTW, My first release of the source package contained a Makefile which I
> removed, because *you* (spotlight on :-) said it was *not* in the
> original source.
> > You also added the CYGWIN-PATCHES dir (This is good, but it's not
> > in the original sources.
> http://cygwin.com/setup.html told me to. Isn't this the usual way to
> include Cygwin-specific stuff?
Yes it is. What I think Volker is saying is that the 'CYGWIN-PATCHES' directory
wouldn't be removed (or added) by the patch you provided.
> > I attached a patch that IMHO does it right. I also "modified" the
> > already present $(prefix) variable that you now can do:
> Looks good. I modified the Makefile.unix and README accordingly.
I'm sorry I haven't updated the list regarding your package proposal, I will try
and have an updated list out in a few hours (max) :-)
Are the URL's the same (for your above modifications)?
Elfyn McBratney, EMCB | http://www.nongnu.org/wwwauth/
http://www.emcb.co.uk | http://www.emcb.co.uk/webauth/
email@example.com | wwwauth-users AT nongnu DOT org