This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: ask-2.5.0 - a new package for review
Max Bowsher wrote:
Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote:
(a Debian) Python Project http://www.paganini.net/ask/ has bee
ported. Please review.
Before you ITP any more packages, you should address the fact that cygbuild
has been vetoed, and therefore, since all your packages use it, they are
blocked until this issue is solved.
Not necessarily. But, you realize Max that neither generic-build-script
nor mknetrel are available as "packages" either? So IMO it doesn't
really matter that cygbuild isn't an official package, as long as it is
I strongly suspect that patches to incrementally enhance
generic-build-script will be welcomed. The objection is that you are trying
to introduce yet another packaging method into an already too-diverse
True, enhancements always welcome. There's one thing I don't want to
do, though: I don't want to turn gbs into an assembly of fragments (e.g.
provide a customized "build()" function but use the default for
everything else, and automatically "assemble" those fragments into a
distributable build script.)
If that's the kind of thing you're looking for, then mknetrel is more