This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: pcre packages
- From: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak <ronald at landheer dot com>
- To: cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:06:26 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: pcre packages
On Wed, 21 May 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 06:59:37PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 06:36:00PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> >> > Btw., I'd split the `ldesc's into multiple lines. Currently they consist
> >> > of one very long line, more than 80 characters.
> >> OK
> >> Are they actually used anywhere, by the way?
> >Not yet...
> >> NB: Please cc me in replies so I receive them without having to go get
> >> them on the web - I don't know why your message didn't come through (did
> >> you use Gmane?) but, it didn't.
> >I never use gmane. I'm just regulary subscribed.
> Can I suggest that a maintainer really should be subscribed to cygwin-apps?
> We shouldn't have to remember to cc people who are maintaining patches.
I *am* subscribed to the list - there's just some mails that don't seem to
get through :(
Most notably, the ones that don't get through always go through Gmane or
are in reply to something that came through Gmane.
I'll take a nother look at my mail filter to see if there are messages
being dumped as spam that shouldn't be, but as I said, it's *another* look
(I've already looked in my filter logs and haven't seen a single false
positive (though I do have some false negatives)). The lists I subscribe
to are presumed not to be spam so normally the spam filter should not even
be a factor..
(BTW: isn't cygwin-apps a subscribers-only list?)