This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: comments on texmf package?
Corinna Vinschen <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I'm not at all familar with tex so I'd like to ask somebody else
> to look into these packages. The setup.hint files are looking ok to
> me. Did you pack using the correct paths as given on
> http://cygwin.com/setup.html#package_contents ?
Yes, I believe so.
> Another point: Aren't we still waiting for tetex-beta-20001218-3
> leaving `test' state or did I miss something?
Yes it seems that way. In this case that's maybe a bit odd, because
tetex-beta-20001218-1 has a number of problems.
> IMO it doesn't make much sense to have these texmf packages in
> `curr' state if they depend on a `test' package.
Ok, so maybe adding some test: tags would not hurt. In any case,
tetex-beta-20001218-3 and texmf-*' tags should be (kept) in sync.
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <email@example.com> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org