This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See crosstool-NG for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hello. I'm looking to use ct-ng to build an arm toolchain but I see that when I build with multilib enabled I end up with these errors: [INFO ] ================================================================= [INFO ] Installing binutils for host [INFO ] Installing binutils for host: done in 142.17s (at 11:46) [INFO ] ================================================================= [INFO ] Installing pass-1 core C compiler [ERROR] checking dynamic linker characteristics... checking whether getchar_unlocked is declared... configure: error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. [ERROR] checking whether putchar_unlocked is declared... make[1]: *** [configure-zlib] Error 1 [ERROR] [ERROR] >> [ERROR] >> Build failed in step 'Installing pass-1 core C compiler' [ERROR] >> called in step '(top-level)' [ERROR] >> [ERROR] >> Error happened in: CT_DoExecLog[scripts/functions@257] [ERROR] >> called from: do_cc_core_backend[scripts/build/cc/gcc.sh@448] [ERROR] >> called from: do_cc_core_pass_1[scripts/build/cc/gcc.sh@101] [ERROR] >> called from: main[scripts/crosstool-NG.sh@624] [ERROR] >> [ERROR] >> For more info on this error, look at the file: 'build.log' [ERROR] >> There is a list of known issues, some with workarounds, in: [ERROR] >> 'docs/B - Known issues.txt' [ERROR] [ERROR] (elapsed: 13:04.23) [13:05] / make: *** [build] Error 2 This is latest hg crosstool, experimental enabled, interwork enabled, multilib enabled, arm architecture. Everything else the default (I can send configuration file of course if someone wants to see it). I'm trying to convince a colleague that we should be using something like ct-ng instead of a hand assembled makefile, to build our toolchain but without multilib support it looks like we'd end up with two toolchains, one for arm7tdmi and one for a cortex-m3 whereas multilib would let us build one toolchain that supported the whole range of arm processors. The makefile he has assembled seems pretty simple, 110 lines, so I can't understand why this isn't easier to do with ct-ng. Chris -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |