This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See crosstool-NG for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
"Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> writes: >> Ideally ct-ng would remember the major version and only >> update the minor, e.g. from gcc-linaro-4.6-2012.08 >> to gcc-linaro-4.6-2012.09. > > OK, that's a sane idea. > > Currently, the config does (roughly!): > > config GCC_V_linaro_4_6_2010_09 > bool "linaro-4.6-2012.09" > > config GCC_VERSION > string > default "linaro-4.6-2012.09" if GCC_V_linaro_4_6_2010_09 > > This could be changed to: > > config GCC_V_linaro_4_6 > bool "linaro-4.6 (2012.09)" > > config GCC_VERSION > string > default "linaro-4.6-2012.09" if GCC_V_linaro_4_6 > > Thus, the new config would "maintain" the linaro 'major' selection, and > only upgrade the 'minor' version. Is that the behavior you are suggesting? I for one would like to see that minor change in behavior :-) > And maybe we could use a similar scheme for other components, such as the > Linux kernel: > > - for the latest major release (eg. gcc-4.7 today), keep all sub-versions > - for previous major releases (eg. gcc-4.6, 4.5...), keep only the "major" > version ID in the config, and update the minor version only in the > "string" option, thus allowing to more easily forward a .config to a > newer ct-ng version. > > Could that be a correct answer to your issue? +1 :-) It would slightly easy upgrading of ct-NG in OE-lite. /Esben -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |