This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See crosstool-NG for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
David, All, On Friday 21 September 2012 06:42:38 David Holsgrove wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User David Holsgrove <david.holsgrove@xilinx.com> > # Date 1348202094 -36000 > # Node ID 886f1bbadce3c2a5ea07a4a46ce140a5a04dc555 > # Parent d9ae5974b0bd4f111c00b38a4edd6656bd1f0226 > scripts/glibc-eglibc.sh-common: broken symlinks created for nested multilib > dirs libc/glibc-eglibc: fix symlinks for nested multilib dirs > glibc-eglibc.sh-common prepares a number of symlinks for use in building C > Library, which is iterated through for each multilib combo, however there is a > hardcoded number of backsteps in the symlink command which assumes the multi_dir > is only 1 directory deep. > > This means we are creating broken symlinks for nested multilib dirs, eg; > > gcc configured with these multilibs (besides the default): > -mxl-barrel-shift --> bs/ > -mxl-barrel-shift -mno-xl-soft-mul --> bs/m/ > -mxl-barrel-shift -mno-xl-soft-mul -mxl-multiply-high --> bs/m/mh/ > > multi_dir=bs; ln -sf "../lib/bs" "bs/lib" <- Ok > multi_dir=bs/m; ln -sf "../lib/bs/m" "bs/m/lib" <- Broken > multi_dir=bs/m/mh; ln -sf "../lib/bs/m/mh" "bs/m/mh/lib" <- Broken > > In the Final C Library step, we perform a "Fixing up multilib location" stage, > which in each loop removes its temporary multi_dir - a problem with nested > multilib dirs, as the first loop may be for 'bs' say, which will remove the > 'bs' directory, and the nested dirs for bs/m, bs/m/mh along with it, before > they have gone through their own do_libc_backend_once iteration. > > The solution I propose is similar to how the build-libc-${libc_mode} > directories are created - replacing '/' with '_' and having a flat structure > for these temp multi_dirs In theory, I have nothing serious against your patch. Except I don't know how to test it. Care to share a defconfig (ct-ng defconfig), please? Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |