This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See crosstool-NG for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Trevor, A,, On Saturday 15 September 2012 16:01:39 Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Trevor Woerner <twoerner@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Yann E. MORIN <yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote: > >>> Could you try a rather simple test for me, please? > >>> Get a make-3.81 from a GNU mirror, compile and install it, but be sure you > >>> install it in a location that is early in the PATH, earlier than make-3.82 > >>> (eg. install in /opt/make and add /opt/make/bin first in the PATH). > >> > >> Yes, this causes my .config file to contain the correct lines: > > > > ...and the subsequent "ct-ng build" succeeds. > > Do other distributions not ship make-3.82? Are they all still waiting > on make-3.81? Is there something I can investigate so release 1.16.0 > works "out of the box"? I'm not sure where it started, but this is a > regression, I don't think I needed to downgrade 'make' in order to use > crosstool-NG before. The problem is that make-3.82 broke many things that had been working with older make versions. For example, make-3.82 broke the linux kernel, gcc, glibc, and many other major packages. Heck, if they wanted to break the API, they should have named it make-4.0. 3.82 pretty much sounds like "release accumulated set of bug fixes after the many year previous version was released" thingy, rather than a major version which would have been allowed to break existing stuff. Even Debian has not yet migrated to make-3.82 (only experimental has it, not even sid). For crosstool-NG, I only use documented features of make, and it was working and is still working perfectly with make-3.81. So _I_ consider that the regresions are in make-3.82. I think that the key point is that make-3.81 did sort the result of $(wildcard ...) while make-3.82 does not. I added a bit of debug stuff into config/config.mk@66: $(info ARCHS ='$(ARCHS)') $(info KERNELS='$(KERNELS)') $(info CCS ='$(CCS)') $(info LIBCS ='$(LIBCS)') $(info DEBUGS ='$(DEBUGS)') And here is what make-3.81 on Debian squeeze gives as a result: ARCHS ='alpha arm avr32 blackfin m68k mips powerpc s390 sh sparc x86' KERNELS='bare-metal linux mingw32' CCS ='gcc' LIBCS ='eglibc glibc mingw newlib none uClibc' DEBUGS ='dmalloc duma gdb ltrace strace' and here's what make-3.82 on openSuSE 12.1 gives as a result: ARCHS ='arm x86 sh avr32 mips sparc powerpc s390 m68k alpha blackfin' KERNELS='mingw32 bare-metal linux' CCS ='gcc' LIBCS ='none mingw eglibc newlib uClibc glibc' DEBUGS ='ltrace gdb duma dmalloc strace' Maybe we could try sorting the output and see if it /fixes/ the issue? So, if someone comes with a patch that: - fixes building crosstool-NG with make-3.82 - does not break building with make-3.81 - if not too ugly I will be glad to apply it. ;-) Regards, Yann E. MORIN. -- .-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |