This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Tutorial

From: Samson Luk <samsonluk at gmail dot com>
To: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann dot morin dot 1998 at anciens dot enib dot fr>
Cc: crossgcc at sourceware dot org, Francesco Turco <mail at fturco dot org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 07:30:45 +0800
Subject: Re: Tutorial
References: <9369044048cfb230c19caa844d9fe7db.squirrel@webmail.fturco.org> <201101171912.42276.yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr>

Yann, Francesco & All,

Couldn't agree more... I would also like to know the benefit between a
static build compiler vs a shared and why a gcc pass 1 is required to
build in static or people even want static in the final build?Â In
Francesco's examples, seems all builds are non-static and I having a
feeling that it might not work for build a real cross compiler.

Regards,
Samson

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Yann E. MORIN
<yann.morin.1998@anciens.enib.fr> wrote:
>
> For example, why one
> needs to build gcc three times. Or why one needs to install the kernel
> headers.
>
> All this might sound obvious to you and us, but to it will most probably
> sound like black magic to newcomers (at least it did to me when I started
> building toolchains).

--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

References:
- Tutorial
  - From: Francesco Turco
- Re: Tutorial
  - From: Yann E. MORIN

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]