This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:40 AM, eastyhasta <eastyhasta@hotmail.fr> wrote: >> >> >> >> Xianghua Xiao-2 wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Bob Dunlop <bob.dunlop@xyzzy.org.uk> >>> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Nov 04 at 02:41, Xianghua Xiao wrote: >>>> ... >>>>> [ERROR] Â ÂBuild failed in step 'Installing CLooG/ppl' >>>> ... >>>>> This is on Ubuntu 10.04. >>>>> >>>>> Anyone saw this? >>>> >>>> Yep, seen it on Gentoo as well. >>>> >>>> I just downgraded the build to CLooG 0.15.9 and all was fine so I guess >>>> the problem is actually with CLooG 0.15.10 rather than ct-ng 1.9.0. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Â Â Â ÂBob Dunlop >>>> >>> >>> This is correct, last night I switched ot CLooG 0.15.9 and it finished >>> without errors this morning. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Xianghua >>> >>> >> >> Hello everyone >> I have the same issue with crosstool-ng-1.9.1 and crosstool-ng-1.9.2. >> I am new on programming on Linux and I don't understand your solution. >> Can you explain it? >> How to downgrade the build to ClooG 0.15.9?? > > There are a few patches floating around, but I'm not sure that path > leads to the right solution. > > http://repo.or.cz/w/cloog-ppl.git -- the cloog-ppl repository > (originally a port of cloog to the parma polyhedra library) hasn't had > an update since late August of 2010. But PPL is still very busy... > > http://repo.or.cz/w/cloog.git -- which was the original cloog tree has > released 0.16.1 4 days ago, and PolyLib > (http://icps.u-strasbg.fr/polylib/) has been gpl3 since January of > 2010. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Graphite/Merge_CLooG_PPL_back_to_CLooG > > I wonder if newer toolchains should use Cloog+PolyLib_or_PPL instead > of Cloog-PPL+PPL, and if it is tested? If this is true, then please > remove 0.15.10. I misspoke. It would be: ClooG+PPL instead of ClooG-PPL+PPL > To use 0.15.9, in `ct-ng menuconfig` navigate to: > Â ÂCompanion Libraries Â---> > Â ÂCLooG/ppl version (0.15.10) Â---> > Â Âand select 0.15.9 > > Or... > > Edit your .config file and set > Â ÂCT_CLOOG_V_0_15_10=y > to > Â Â# CT_CLOOG_V_0_15_10 is not set > > ...and set > Â Â# CT_CLOOG_V_0_15_9 is not set > to > Â ÂCT_CLOOG_V_0_15_9=y > > ...and set > Â ÂCT_CLOOG_VERSION to 0.15.9 > > I prefer the ct-ng menuconfig way, personally. ;-) > >> Thanks >> Eastyhasta >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/CLOOG-ppl-failure-in-ct-ng-1.9.0-tp30135491p30651275.html >> Sent from the Sourceware - crossgcc list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> -- >> For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq >> >> > > > -Bryan > -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |